Porantim wrote: > When Jimmy puts his personal feelings as the unique argument, no more have > to say. When he puts his friendship against the interests of the community, > no more remain to do. > > You know, Jimmy is a kind of symbol to some us, maybe all of us. Then, when > he puts this conversation in that maniqueist form, I don't know what more > remain. > > Jimmy has feelings about Thomas. That's OK to me, but there is no argument > against that, when that is de unique argument.
Porantim, I would like to be your friend as well. Please don't take anything that I have said as being a matter of taking sides against you or for Thomas *and* especially not supposing that I have any opinion on the proposed bylaw changes (I don't even know what they are). All that I have said is that I met Thomas, and based on what I know of him, he will be a peace seeker and he has no interest in being any kind of boss or tyrant of the chapter process. Nor is he an aggressive person. I found the suggestions (I don't know who made them first, perhaps not you) that the chapter might be at risk of being used for purposes of money laundering to be a bit over top, and I felt it important to mention what little I do know. Again, I will meet with Thomas, and I will ask him what is going on, and I will recommend to him that everyone should make peace. It is not helpful to suppose that I am putting my "friendship against the interests of the community". --Jimbo _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
