I wouldn't mind a standard that said that identifiable, contemporary nudes (i.e. images with faces showing which aren't decades old) would be deleted if there aren't being used on any Wikimedia project. There is a non-trivial risk of harm if we simply allow unlimited inclusion of photos that under normal circumstance would usually be considered private, and when the photos aren't in actual use I think respect for that risk should usually outweigh the consideration that they might possibly be useful some day.
-Robert Rohde On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Huib Laurens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe that we have a lot of images from flickr with sexual > content. And there is no way to make sure that the (Fe)male on the > photo agrees with the photo on commons or the licence it is under. > > I have tryed to nominate images like that for deletion. I can say all > image are kept. The main reasson was the image is free so we can have > it. > > I believe that image with sexual content have to be checked... Do we > need it... Is it really free.... Isn't there a other option than a > image. > > We have more than one category with nude male or female images and > most of them are not in use on any project. I don't think we need the > images with very young people on it. > > Huib > > -- > Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but pictures > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SterkeBak > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l