> There may be some of that, but it is also true that a lot of experts > are actually unhelpful (perhaps we could do something to improve that, > though - a system for experts to review articles, rather than edit > them, might be good). When experts get involved in editing there are > often ownership and original research issues (or, to be more precise, > WP:OWN and WP:OR issues - following an earlier discussion, I deleted > the acronyms and wrote them out in full and then realised that > actually that makes my statement ambiguous since people don't know if > I'm using the terms in their general dictionary meanings or their very > precise Wikipedia policy meanings, and in fact, I meant the latter - > jargon serves a purpose and from now on I think I'm just going to use > it!).
Have a look at what I was preparing if you are interested http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Yaroslav_Blanter/Temp17 Cheers Yaroslav _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
