Delirium wrote: > Tim Starling wrote: >> I'm not seeing anything in that rant that contradicts the point I was >> making. They might be different to Wikitravel in other ways, but they are >> the same in terms of the lack of relevance of a content-related complaint >> to foundation-l. >> > > The point I was making is that the fact that people thought a > content-related complaint about Wikia might be relevant to the > foundation is the fault primarily of Wikia and the Foundation, and > especially its entangled principals, not the fault of a newbie > complainer who was misled by the association.
A fair point, and I'm glad you finally made it. But I was only trying to correct an error in the original post which had not been pointed out by the previous replies, it wasn't my intention to lay blame. > Given your conflict of interest in this matter, you are also not > particularly well positioned to comment. I think I'm entitled to comment regardless of who I am, but you can to ask me to state my interests to the list. I am a Wikimedia employee, and my wife is a cofounder, employee and stockholder of Wikia. -- Tim Starling _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
