geni <[email protected]> writes: >> Having no banners and no servers to serve the artuicles are even >> worse. Having payed the dangeld to get rid of them, I think most are >> happy being acknowledged for the fact.
> You miss the point. The banners are not fundraising any more (unless > you collapse them) Most of the whining you have seen is about the actual fundraising banners. Unless you google alaert for wikipedia and wikimedia gives you other results than mine. >> I don't agree on that point. Having extorted 6+ million $ out of >> the readers with a Jesus headline, and then switching the thank you >> note to leagal flyspeck, would send the wrong signal. If we NEED >> Joe Bloggs meney, we'd better THANK him in the same way. Otherwise >> he may OVERLOOK the plea next time it comes around. > Any evidence for those claims? And how about thanking him by not > degrading his wikipedia experience? I claim nothing else than it's my own opinion. Excuse me for getting that part wrong (I'm not a native english speaker), but I would've thought that "I think" would indicate that. -- /Wegge _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
