On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Mike Godwin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Anthony writes: >> >> > Which part is unclear? The dumps contain my copyrighted work. You >> > have no >> > license to distribute them (you might have once had a license under >> > the >> > GFDL, but I explicitly and permanently terminated those rights over >> > 30 days >> > ago in an email to you). >> >> It was unclear to me that you believe you have the right to revoke the >> GFDL license you freely granted under copyright law. I'm unclear as >> to what legal theory could be relied upon to revoke a free license. >> > > I'm surprised you never learned that, but fortunately it's irrelevant. > Just reread section 9 of the GFDL. I find it rather astounding that you > don't know what it says. >
Especially since it was one of the major changes (probably the second biggest) to GFDL 1.3. Seriously, how could you not be familiar with that change? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
