That sounds a bit like a politician not wanting to admit that they've abandoned a policy or goal! ;)
It does seem to be the case that it has been decided that the earlier ideals of *full* transparency and no hierarchy were naive and have been abandoned. James On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, James Rigg > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Thanks geni. >> >> So, to put it crudely, the talk of full transparency and lack of >> hierarchy is now viewed as just naive idealism that existed at the >> start of the project, and which has now been abandoned? >> >> Best >> >> James >> > > Not so much that--as a great many things are done openly. > I think it's more a general agreement that some things, by > their very nature, can't be done openly. > > -Chad > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
