2009/1/10 James Rigg <[email protected]>: > I'm not questioning here whether or not there are good reasons for > sometimes being non-transparent and hierarchical, I'm just saying that > it's interesting that, contrary to its founding ideals, and probably > also to how many people think, or like to think, Wikipedia is run, it > is not run in a fully transparent and non-hierarchical way.
Tens of thousands of active editors a month. That such a thing could run without bureaucracy defies rational thought. Also, you can't actually stop people talking amongst themselves. See "Tyranny of Structurelessness." - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
