I believe the point that Jimbo is making (i will certainly be corrected if wrong :-) is that there is no externally imposed hierarchy. The wiki really did start as a tabula rasa, and all discussions of its hierarchy can be found in its pages.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM, James Rigg <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Jimmy Wales <[email protected]> wrote: > > James Rigg wrote: > >> Thanks geni. > >> > >> So, to put it crudely, the talk of full transparency and lack of > >> hierarchy is now viewed as just naive idealism that existed at the > >> start of the project, and which has now been abandoned? > > > > No, not at all. > > > > > > But there isn't full transparency, and there is a hierarchy. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- You have successfully failed! _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
