Perhaps, do you have a link? :)
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2009 20:08:22 Brian wrote: > > pointed out, "I would bet there's at least one template that uses a > > ParserFunction on 75% or more of all the articles on enwiki." MediaWiki > > effectively has a programming language in it because of a few hours of > > developer work and a few minutes of conversation. A programming language > > that, apparantly, cannot be reverted. > > That programming language was introduced solely because Wikipedia editors > have > already been using another programming language, which had the same > capabilities, but used much more resources. If you can get Wikipedians not > to > use any programming language in their templates, you can effectively revert > the change, and I don't see why the extension wouldn't be turned off > afterwards. > > > I have been to the developer presentations at all but one Wikimania, and > > they are dissapointing. I don't really see new ideas for features being > > presented to the community, and I do not believe that the developers > ideas > > Including mine? :) > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
