On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:55 PM, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/1/20 Anthony <[email protected]>: > > That doesn't really any of my questions, though I was more looking for an > > answer from Erik or Mike anyway. > > > > It's a fairly important question, since compatibility with other works > under > > CC-BY-SA is allegedly the main reason for the relicensing. > > > > Is the question clear? Maybe I should be even more specific. How would > one > > go about using content from Citizendium in Wikipedia, if Wikipedia > > relicenses content under CC-BY-SA? > > Assuming a large number of authors on Citizendium. Use the export > function there to provide the file in a useful format and reactivate > the import function on en to export it (at a pinch is should be > possible to put together a script that can grab the relevant > information and turn it into a file suitable for import to wikipedia > without having to use the export function). >
That would destroy the usability of diffs. > How would a third party go about using > > the combined work? > > Depends on the context. In the context of a printed book using an article which was 60% originated in Wikipedia, 20% originated in Citizendium, and 20% originated by the book authors? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
