On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm glad someone is concerned about this issue. Wikia has always smacked of > "they wouldn't let us show ads on Wikipedia, so here is the for-profit > branch of Wikipedia with ads." There are potential conflicts of interest at > nearly every level of the Wikia/Wikipedia relationship. > Wikia's content is nearly entirely orthogonal to Wikimedia Foundation projects. It's hosting community projects (for profit, using ads for revenue) which aren't encyclopedic or educational. There's no more conflict of interest in what they're doing (as a business model) than a conflict with Google, Facebook, Myspace, etc. The personnel overlaps are a potential conflict of interest. The board's job is to review and avoid actual conflicts of interest. If this was in fact the same cost as any other reasonable alternative, and had the additional proximity benefits with Wikia personnel doing the same general type of work, then the Board having reviewed it and OKed it is fine by me. Leaping from "obviously needs scrutiny" to "assuming bad faith" is poor form, Brian. That is not helpful. -- -george william herbert [email protected] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
