Well, either way, there's no harm in asking him to upload ones without the watermark.
- Chris On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>wrote: > Hoi, > As far as I know, Commons has no such thing on watermarking. As always, > come > up with better illustrations and you can replace them. This is an > extraordinary situation anyway... Wikipedia has also this other "rule; > Ignore all rules.. A good one to apply for now. > Thanks, > GerardM > > 2009/1/29 Chris Down <[email protected]> > > > As a note, the images are watermarked, and I have notified the user. IUP > > states that this should not occur. > > > > - Chris > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > 2009/1/28 Andrew Whitworth <[email protected]>: > > > > Wikipedia would have to write some kind of > > > > special exception to every rule to allow this book to exist there. > > > > > > We already have the only exception we need: IAR. (That doesn't means > > > Wikibooks wouldn't handle it better, though!) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > foundation-l mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
