2009/1/30 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8...@gmail.com>: > I'm certainly anti-censorship, so I don't advocate deleting all or any > nude photographs. However, asking uploaders a few basic questions > about their uploaded nudes (is the depicted model above the age of > consent? is the depicted model aware that this photograph was taken? > Is the depicted model aware that this photo is being uploaded here?) > could help a lot of people avoid a lot of problems. Remember, it's not > just the WMF who risks potential problems (and admittedly as an ISP > the WMF's risk is probably very low), it's the people who are being > depicted abusively that are going to have the biggest problems with > these images. > > --Andrew Whitworth
I would probably view it as an issue of image quality. We have had Template:Nopenis for some time which among other things focuses on quality. The providence of an image is a quality issue. Since we have no shortage of pics of women in various states of undress (see Category:Nude women and Category:Female genitalia) some of which have fairly clear providence (see Category:SuicideGirls for example) I see no reason why we should accept further images of questionable providence and quality. I've already created Template:Nobreasts and it would probably useful if someone put together Template:Novulva -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l