2009/2/1 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > So far I have not heard any arguments why the CC-by-sa cannot do this.
It can but can only do this when everyone agrees. Since wikipedia currently has 282,180,603 edits by people who have not agreed such a change is imposible. >I > have only heard a lot of FUD that I qualify as narcistic. FUD that does not > contribute to more FREE colloaboration and re-use. I understand license text and copyright law can be considered FUD by some however it is FUD that is important. > The one argument against the CC-by-sa that takes the prize is the notion > that we will have less influence with Creative Commons ... yet another great > narcissistic argument. Not really. The fact is experience shows that every free license has issues (for example CC-BY-SA 3.0 contains an invariant section clause although I doubt that was CC's intention). Wikipedia by it's very nature tends to hit these issues before anyone else. Having influence means we in theory have a better chance of getting such issues fixed. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
