.1% is a very large sample, statistically speaking. On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I only think a poll of the community could settle the issue. Is > > there any point in requiring full attribution if only 0.001% of the > > community desires it? If 75+% of the community thinks that a > > single mention that an article is "from Wikipedia" isn't nearly > > enough, is there any point to suggesting that as a solution? > > > If only 0.1% of Wikipedia authors respond to the poll, how does that change > your questions? > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
