On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > The Zwijntje picture is actually one that is rather special. I use it as an > avatar on many of my profiles. When people abuse this picture, it may hurt > me. There is another aspect as well, I am not arguing about attribution to > the nth degree of foolishness. It is also very unlikely that I will go to > court over my IP. This is where I am utterly different from the RIAA because > it is part of their business model. > > So in essence, it is normal to attribute material using the best practices. > The GFDL was long considered to be a best practice by me. This is no longer > the case for the type of material that we deal with in Wikipedia and > Commons. Certainly not following the arguments that I have heard so far from > the proponents of staying with the GFDL for WMF projects. The irony is that > it iseven the FSF that agrees that we are better off with the CC-by-sa.
You do know what the "by" in CC-by-sa means, I hope? -- André Engels, [email protected] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
