I see no '100 edits at meta' restriction. Am I missing something? - Chris
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Brian Salter-Duke <[email protected]>wrote: > I am rather disturbed at the discussion on meta here:- > > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Simple_English_(2)_Wikipedia<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Simple_English_%282%29_Wikipedia> > > about closing this project and I am surpried that the issue has not come > up here. While the consensus is clearly against closure, so it likely > will not happen, there are issues. Is this kind of discussion on Meta > really the best way to handle this kind of issue? I am particularly > concerned about the suggestion that only meta regulars (with more than > 100 edits there) can contribute. This prevents or at least discourages > the users of Simple from going to Meta to comment. I also wonder whether > Simple editors really know about this issue, although I see it is > mentioned on their main page. > > There is also a similar discussion about closing the Simple Wiktionary. > > These issues need a much wider and intelligent debate than they are > receiving. They are too important for there to be any chance that they > just dissappear one day, with most people not knowing about it. > > Brian. > > -- > Brian Salter-Duke [email protected] > [[User:Bduke]] is single user account with en:Wikipedia main account. > Also on Meta-Wiki, Wikiversity, fr:Wikipedia and others. > Treasurer, Wikimedia Australia Inc, Go Wikimedia Australia Inc, Go! > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
