On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > A further argument against having this principally discussed on Meta is > that those who are best served by Simple do not have the language skills > to participate fully in a discussion where there is unlimited use of > language. > > Ec > That would be just as true for a project in any other language but standard English. What you're saying is that Meta isn't perfect - which is true. Do you have a better alternative? The question of how such a discussion would be closed is what concerns me the most - I can't see allowing a meta bureaucrat to close such a poll (which is what we would do in en.wp), and since the Foundation would have to make the changes anyway... Would it be interpreted, then, by a developer? Nathan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
