i think there is a valid point here though.  you are on a committee that has
a certain level of power.  committees who make decisions on behalf of the
committee should surely be able to be held to account by the community.  if
you look at this comment in this way then it can be interpreted as "when is
the committe re-elected, what will be the voitng process etc".

regards

mark


On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hoi,
> <grin> with your attitude it is not strange why we do not have people who
> are in a position of power frequenting the Foundation list </grin> sad.. it
> kinda kills effective conversation
> Thanks,
>       GerardM
>
> 2009/2/26 geni <[email protected]>
>
> > 2009/2/26 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:
> > > Hoi,
> > > So you will shoot the messenger? Read back in this track and you will
> > read
> > > that when simple is proven to be actually useful.. I will actually
> > consider
> > > this, I will even promote the idea. Now, that takes convincing and
> there
> > is
> > > a need for good arguments.  I am not the enemy, I am the one that
> > actually
> > > talks and engages in the discussion, <grin> I can be convinced </grin>
> > You
> > > are doing a poor job at that.
> > > Thanks,
> > >       GerardM
> >
> >
> > You are in a position of power thus I repeat how do we get rid of you?
> >
> > --
> > geni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to