On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/3/2 Sue Gardner <[email protected]>: > > > * Are there technical tools we could implement, that would support > greater > > quality in BLPs? For example – easy problem reporting systems, > > particular configurations of Flagged Revs, etc. > > Flagged Revs is an excellent way of dealing with vandalism to BLPs, > technical solutions to more subtle problems are a little trickier. > Flagged Revs could be used with addition levels - a "free of > vandalism" level and a "well balanced, fact-checked and free of > anything remotely libellous" level. Two separate levels are necessary > since the 2nd takes far too long to be a practical vandal fighting > tool - I'm not sure which level would be shown by default to whom, > that needs to be worked out. That might help for actual biographies, but it doesn't help much when BLP-violations happen in other places, particularly article Talk: pages. In my experience that's all to common. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
