> One of your points there was: >> 6. The current experience (or at least my current experience) is not >> really encouraging. The real top researchers just plainly have no time >> to edit articles, nor are they really interested. Those who come are >> mostly interested in editing article about themselves or about their >> immediate research, and view this as a kind of free PR. > The same might be said of articles about Wikipedia. If you don't get > any responses within 48 hours you are unlikely to get any at all. I see > one response there but that is most likely because of the message to > which I am responding. Your comments are on "Temp17" of what is > probably a much longer series of personal subpages. There is very > likelihood that anyone will ever see it, let alone respond. > > Ec
Actually, I only have Temp17, and I was preparing it in my personal space (so far provided links to several users), but on one occasion a couple of months ago I posted it in this mailing list. It there is any interest, I will obviously move it to the general meta namespace. I did not yet check the comments, will do now. Cheers Yaroslav _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
