Baseline, maybe?
________________________________ From: Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2009 10:18:01 AM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Attribution survey and licensing next steps 2009/3/7 Erik Moeller <[email protected]>: > The author attribution survey is now closed. We have 1017 complete > responses. I've posted results of the attribution data in the > following report: > > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attribution_Survey_Results.pdf > > I've posted the raw data of the attribution survey here: > > Respondents from English Wikipedia: > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-en.ods > Respondents from German Wikipedia: > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-de.ods > Respondents from miscellaneous languages and projects: > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-misc.ods Thanks. I'm curious, why did you include options that aren't actually available? No credit and credit to the community are clearly not in keeping with the license, so knowing who would accept them isn't particularly useful (although I'm not sure it hurts). _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
