On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Mike Linksvayer <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:46 PM, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/3/6 Mike Linksvayer <[email protected]>: > >> Yes. > >> > >> Mike (not the CC counsel but just spoke to her) > > > > And what was the exact wording of the question asked and what was the > > line of reasoning? > > The question was whether attribution by URL works offline as well as on. > > It was a very simple question (though she's read this thread) and > answer, didn't go into reasoning. I see you've posted a blog post ( http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13232) which suggests that attribution by link was added in 2.5. You point to this a blog post by Mia Garlick (http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5447) announcing the draft changes. From the content of those changes I gather that you are referring to the clause regarding the "terms of service or other reasonable means". Is this correct? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
