2009/3/11 Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org>: > 2009/3/11 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: >>> Why? The language doesn't require you to include a full list of >>> authors. Only if you want your copy to be a "link-creditable" copy, >>> you would need to do so. > >> Is provideing credit reasonable to the medium or means an additional >> requirement? > > No; the attribution terms merely describe what the license means in > the context of the specific collaborative work that it's applied to.
So you wouldn't have to make a note when you imported wikipedia material even though it couldn't be under the TOS you described. >>> That's true for any approach that utilizes hyperlinks; there are >>> probably technical strategies we can use to mitigate it. >> >> Nope. Not as long as the deletion button continues to exist. > > We already make deletion logs visible to everyone; is there any reason > why we shouldn't do the same with contribution histories other than > the occasional case where they include information that shouldn't be > publicly viewable? > Other than? Don't you remember what happened last time we tried it? -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
