2009/3/21 Erik Moeller <[email protected]>: > So let's step back for a second. There is a claim that the legal code > of CC-BY-SA cannot be reconciled with the notion of attributing via > URL-linkback only. Do you agree that this claim is false? If the claim > is false, then surely it is possible to create terms and conditions > for a website under which authors contribute under such a model. If it > is possible, then the final question is whether the current proposed > terms for the edit page satisfy those conditions. I contend that they > do, because they are sufficiently clear about the intended > consequences (we don't need to spell out in detail how the terms and > conditions relate to the license, as long as it's possible for them to > relate to the license in a way that is logical and consistent).
Again you miss the point. Wikipedia has 293,896,584 edits that were not released under those TOS. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
