2009/3/23 Michael Peel <[email protected]>: > Perhaps a better thing to quantify is the usefulness, rather than the > quality? That is, ask the people reading and using articles how > useful the article has been to them? > > Or, more generally, ask them to rate articles on a scale of 1 to N, > where N is e.g. 5.
There are several extensions available for this: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AjaxRatingScript http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:JSKitRating http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Rating http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Rating_Bar If there is a consensus for it, it shouldn't be difficult to get it turn on. I'm not sure you'll get such a consensus, though... (not because it's a bad idea, but because we don't seem to be able to get a consensus on anything these days) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
