Michael Snow wrote: > The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation invites the Wikimedia > community to vote on this proposal to license Wikimedia material so it > is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license > (CC-BY-SA), while retaining dual licensing with the GNU Free > Documentation License. The Board has evaluated possible licensing > options for Wikimedia material, and believes that this proposal is the > best available path towards achieving our collective goal to collect, > develop and disseminate educational material, and make it available to > people everywhere, free of charge, in perpetuity. > To elaborate a little further, speaking now in a personal capacity. Exploring the fine details of copyleft licensing gets into complex issues, some of which we've debated on this list. The complexity means many subtly different positions are possible, and we could probably debate endlessly without reaching ideal solutions to those subtle differences. That's part of why (as mentioned) individual board and staff members, like everyone else, are free and encouraged to express their own views about these matters.
By comparison, though, the vote we will have is more simple and straightforward. It's not an effort to create a platonically perfect license in the ideal world, which is likely impossible, rather it's asking whether the relicensing allowed by the GFDL 1.3 is progress in a practical sense. I think that's what we mean in agreeing that this is the "best available" course at this time. --Michael Snow _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
