Elisabeth Anderl wrote: > Hello all, this is a very old and often discussed issue, > the problems raised with the logo were not yet addressed (such as copyright > issues, which characters to use), and the new 'logo' is IMHO the most ugly > thing I have ever seen. > > Btw.: from alexa.com: > Where people go on Wiktionary.org: > > - en.wiktionary.org - 48.6% <- old logo > - de.wiktionary.org - 12.8% <- old logo > - fr.wiktionary.org - 9.7% <- new logo > - ru.wiktionary.org - 3.6% <- old logo > - es.wiktionary.org - 3.1% <- old logo > - ja.wiktionary.org - 2.9% <- old logo > - pl.wiktionary.org - 2.4% <- old logo > - pt.wiktionary.org - 2.3% <- old logo > - it.wiktionary.org - 1.6% <- new logo > - el.wiktionary.org - 1.5% <- new logo > > Guess how many Wiktionarians apprently like the new logo...
I didn't take part in the discussion and the vote, but this is a poor attempt to justify the old logo. People do not look at a web site like Wiktionary because of the logo. > Best regards, E. Regards, Yann -- http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net http://fr.wikisource.org/ | Bibliothèque libre http://wikilivres.info | Documents libres _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
