HELL PERHAPS. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> wrote:
> On a serious note, however, I would say HELL YES. > > Ryan Kaldari > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> wrote: > > At this point I would suggest that we go ahead and block access to > > Wikipedia from the UK entirely. Wikipedia isn't compatible with their > > censorship, libel, copyright, or privacy policies. > > > > Ryan Kaldari > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/03/22/open-letter-call-for-major-websites-to-opt-out-of-phorm/ > >> > >> Should we say "er, no, not our data either" or ignore them? > >> > >> (This has been discussed on internal lists as well, with all > >> commenting saying "HELL YES." The question then is whether, by some > >> obscure legal twist, this would leave WMF somehow exposed. And whether > >> it's worth it anyway.) > >> > >> > >> - d. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> foundation-l mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
