> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Jaska Zedlik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 21:27, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > The question was about a list which should exist somewhere (at Meta). >> > >> >> Thank you, but not obligatory a list. I meant any form, even a number >> of rules written on this mailing list. Otherwise we (may) have a >> situation when, for instance, a user puts some inflammatory or >> divisive content on their user page and administrators are unable to >> delete it, until a policy which regulates this is adopted locally. > > > > Even english wikipedia was close to allow divisive and inflammatory > content > on an user page: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Visitante > > Becuase, ¡hey everyone is allowed to write about wikipedia on his > userpage > even if it's attacking other project > even if account makes no other edits in years > policy allows it > and it's not about english wikipedia sysops > > thankfully there are still admins with common sense. But the point is > even in Wikipedias with a "complete" set of rules > it's not enough to counteract trolls > precisely because so many rules create so many loopholes for wikilawyers > and > rule worshippers
>From the deleted user page: "Informe sobre la censura existente en la Wikipedia hispana "El precio de la libertad es la eterna vigilancia" ¿Quién vigila a los vigilantes? (Quis custodiet ipsus custodes)" Hard to know, without knowing Spanish, and doing some serious investigation whether this is an expose of a serious problem on the Spanish Wikipedia or just green ink http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_ink Thing is, there are always going to be problems, and the problems and issues on all Wikipedias are going to be similar, thus common principles apply. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
