On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM, private musings <[email protected]> wrote:
> On a tangential note, I've also been looking at various governmental, and > NGO 'codes of conduct', some of which recommend things like accurate record > keeping on model information, ensuring users confirm that they wish to view > material reasonably defined as 'adult', etc. etc. - perhaps we could take > some pointers from some of these paths which are already well trodden. Why don't you write articles about these, or a meta essay based on them. Here is another good place to start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_release > It's also my view that, generally speaking, the level of conversation about > this is rubbish - please try to avoid pulling either the 'censorship' and > 'prude' guns or the 'immoral' and 'depraved' guns out - they're just not > helpful. How about 'unclean hands'. In the recent en.wp discussion that you mention, you added an image of a erect penis on the main noticeboard, and said that an editor down the pub told you that it was Giano's member. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=284498586 (not safe for work) And you have embedded these images, which you decry as inappropriate, on your own essay: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Privatemusings/Lets_talk_about_sex -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
