"Can a noncommercial critical website use the trademark of the entity it critiques in its domain name? Surprisingly, it appears that the usually open-minded folks at Wikipedia think not."
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/wikipedia-threatens- While I would regard the title of the article as misleading this is going to be something of a PR problem. Legally I've not looked at it closely and trademark isn't my thing although there may be potential to annoy everyone by arguing that the well documented existence of the "wikipedia loves art" err brand means there are potential passing off issues. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
