2009/5/2 geni <[email protected]>: > 2009/5/2 Sue Gardner <[email protected]>: >> Hi folks, >> >> I wrote here earlier about the process we're imagining for this >> project; I'm going to take a minute now to write about the substance >> of the work. This isn't a direct response to any of the comments made >> here thus far, but I hope it'll indirectly speak to some of the issues >> you've brought up. >> >> As always, I would love your input. The goal here is to work towards a >> small number of sharply-focused highest-priority questions, so we can >> explore each one deeply, and come up with actionable priorities. >> >> Currently, I'm imagining three major Working Groups, each of which >> will have various Sub-Groups helping them with specific pieces of >> their scope. The three Working Groups, I am imagining right now, would >> focus on Reach, Quality and Participation. >> > > Would they have a budget? If not whats the point? Wikipedia is not > short of places to have conversations.
What would they spend it on? Talk is cheap, after all! Having conversations is easy, having focused conversations that actually reach useful conclusions is a little harder, but it isn't more expensive. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
