On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 2009/5/10 Anthony <[email protected]>: >> > The private parts of the database are probably more valuable than the >> public >> > ones, though. >> >> Why? The private parts are just deleted stuff. The deleted stuff isn't >> generally very valuable, that's why it was deleted. > > > Mostly I meant the user data (especially the passwords). The relative > value of them compared to the rest can be shown by anyone who tries to > create a fork. >
By the way, the same argument could be made about all the prior versions - it "generally isn't very valuable", and that's why it was edited. The current versions, or something close to them, are widespread enough to do in case of catastrophe. Google cache, answers.com, etc. At least for the English language version, anyway. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
