On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > The biggest problem for Wikinews in my mind is that delivering news is a > competitive and innovative business. In the on-line and comprehensive > encyclopedia vacuum, Wikipedia was able to be "get there first, with the > most" and draw eyeballs and participants by being the leader. Wikinews, by > contrast, is at a substantial disadvantage when it comes to online news > reporting. There are hundreds of major news sites that offer content at no > charge (although not "free" in the sense we usually mean), with the huge > benefit of full time, paid reporting staff.
You're right about Wikinews as an all-purpose news source: the commercial sites were there first and do it better. But as a hub of citizen journalism, Wikinews does still have a chance to be the first important site. At this point, the world of citizen journalism is extremely diffuse. One route for getting Wikinews to really work might involve two strategies: forming partnerships with other non-profit news organizations to syndicate content, so that Wikinews is a usable first-stop general news website; and focusing volunteer (and possibly Foundation) resources on identifying reporting opportunities and recruiting established amateur journalists to contribute their work to Wikinews *in addition to* their normal venues. Maybe the Foundation could work with one of the journalism grant sources (like the Knight Foundation) to design grants for professional freelance journalists who want to work on big stories where a cadre of web-savvy volunteers could usefully collaborate. -Sage _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
