2009/5/14 Fred Bauder <[email protected]>: >> 2009/5/14 Fred Bauder <[email protected]>: >>> I suggest that Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not include Wikipedia is not >>> a >>> manual of sexual practices. It could be phrased Wikipedia is not the >>> Karma Sutra. >> >> What about pictures of Muhammad? Descriptions of Chinese human rights >> violations? Articles about evolution? etc. etc. etc. >> >> The reason that Wikipedia is not censored is because we cannot censor >> one thing and maintain neutrality without censoring everything else >> that might offend somebody and we would end up without anything left. >> > > I'm sure there is a name for this logical fallacy, but I'm not going to > spend hours looking for it.
There is no name for it because it is not false. > I assume that when you appear in public you cover your private parts. It > does not follow that you need to cover every part of yourself. When I appear in public I wear clothing in keeping with the local cultural norms. That is not neutral. I am not neutral. I have never claimed to be and never will (except in very specific contexts). I, however, am not Wikipedia. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
