On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:19 PM, effe iets anders <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > 2009/5/22 Anthony <[email protected]> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:12 PM, effe iets anders < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 2009/5/22 Anthony <[email protected]> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Which way do neutral votes count on RfA? >>> > >>> >>> 1) at which project (and please dont use enwiki abbreviations) >> >> >> The important one (and why not). >> > Ah, meta? :) - seriously, i don't see why only to consider enwiki methods. > Sure, most voters came from there, but this is an interwiki decision, where > interwiki measures would make more sense. > In my opinion it shouldn't have ever been put to a vote in the first place, so I guess I agree with you. > But well, not that it matters anyway, these things should be decided > /beforehand/ not afterwards. > 50% was decided beforehand as the threshold for sending to the board. > 2) does it matter? :) >> >> >> Just wondering. >> >> I see from >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/Riana/Bureaucrat_discussionthat >> they seem to be excluded from the %. >> > well, since those are about people, and this isn't, I dont see any > relevance :P > Whatever. I didn't ask the question for your benefit. > Usually the two categories are treated differently. > As they should be. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
