Wikibooks uses GFDL. We do have some revisions which may be multi-licensed, but it's probably not safe to assume that any books are entirely multi-licensed (though some do make that claim).
-Mike On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 02:12 +0100, David Gerard wrote: > 2009/5/23 Mike.lifeguard <[email protected]>: > > > I have been keeping an eye on what content got imported on English > > Wikibooks. If there has been anything imported from offsite GFDL-only > > sources I'm not aware of it. To be honest though, that's not saying much > > - we often have contributors bring us whole books they wrote elsewhere - > > but that's not a violation since they'd be the copyright holder and can > > relicense it however they want. I doubt there are any similar cases > > which do violate the terms, but I'd love some help checking that. > > > What are licensing requirements for Wikibooks and Wikisource? Did they > require GFDL or would any free license do, as is the case for Commons? > > (I would have thought a freer choice of licenses would have been > feasible, since works are likely to stay separate. I'd have > particularly thought this the case for Wikisource.) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
