2009/5/27 Angela <[email protected]>: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, philippe <[email protected]> wrote: >> The reason not to have it in two weeks is that it generally takes >> longer than that to effectively translate both the policy pages and >> the candidate statements to allow as many people to participate in as >> many languages as possible. Two weeks would almost guarantee a >> primarily english-centric election. In the past we've had no problem >> getting the votes counted/confirmed in two days; we did it last year. > > I believe the suggestion is to have the vote lasting for 2 weeks, not > starting in 2 weeks from now. > > Voting last for 3 weeks in past elections. > > Angela > indeed, thanks for clarifying :)
Lodewijk _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
