Hoi, The license has been published here... http://www.waveprotocol.org/patent-license Thanks, GerardM
2009/5/30 Tim Starling <[email protected]> > Milos Rancic wrote: > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Tim Starling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> It's not free software. The blog post says they "intend to open source > >> the code". That generally means the code quality is so bad that they'd > >> be embarrassed to make it public, and would like to clean it up to the > >> point where humans can understand it, but currently they have more > >> important development priorities and no schedule to do such a thing. > > > > This is why that (very long) presentation is important. They clearly > > said that they want to make their implementation as the referent open > > source implementation. > > Funny, that's exactly what the blog post said, which I just quoted. I > guess I was right not to waste an hour of my Saturday watching that > presentation. > > Wanting it to be free software does not make it free software. The > code has to actually be published with a permissive license. Until > then, it is proprietary software. > > -- Tim Starling > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
