Thank you for the information, John, do you have a link I can refer to when I quote that? Kind regards Ziko
2009/6/1 John at Darkstar <[email protected]> > Sunday 31th of May the Norwegian newspaper VG (Verdens Gang) compared > Wikipedia in Norsk (Bokmål) and Store Norske Leksikon. The latter > encyclopedia is a large traditional paper lexicon transfered to a web > portal, together with to other lexicons; one medical and health lexicon > and one biographical lexicon. SNL has transfered from a closed licensing > model to an open licensing model, and also open up for outside > contributions. > > The roundup focused on five different areas; history, culture, > entertainment, society and politics, and sport. The grades goes from 1 > to 6, with 6 as the best. > > History: Wp 5 - SNL 5 > (Det norske arbeiderparti, Andre verdenskrig, Vikinger, Vikingtid) > > Culture: Wp 4 - SNL 3 > (Edvard Munch, Henrik Ibsen, Leif Ove Andsnes, Hjalmar Borgström, > Ungdommens kulturmønstring) > > Entertainment: Wp 5 - SNL 2 > (Melodi Grand Prix, Harald Eia, Tone Damli Aaberget, Nytt på nytt, > Alexander Rybak, Idol, Wenche Foss, Sivert Høyem) > > Society and politics: Wp 5 - SNL 3 > (Kristin Halvorsen, AUF-skandalen, Rødt, Saera Khan) > > Sport: Wp 5 - SNL 3 > (Marit Breivik, Tore André Flo, Tore Reginiussen, Kjetil André Aamodt, > Fotball-VM > > The comparison seems to have a slight bias because there are two much > articles about persons and events fairly close to present time. > Wikipedia is much better on that kind of articles compared to more > classical lexicon articles, where it can be assumed that SNL would be > somewhat better. > > John > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Ziko van Dijk NL-Silvolde _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
