Дана Monday 15 June 2009 21:09:36 Erik Moeller написа: > 2009/6/15 Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]>: > > Дана Monday 15 June 2009 20:24:39 Robert Rohde написа: > >> The terms of use for editors will require that editors accept linking > >> as sufficient attribution; however, the instructions for re-users will > > > > Why do the terms require that, when this is in collision with actual > > licences? > > For reference, I've summarized our position on this point here: > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-March/050953.html > > Of course we're not going to re-open this discussion. The revised
The discussion was closed? > terms will be implemented on all applicable sites in the coming days, > beginning today. I, for one, have written a piece of javascript that removes disputed text from the page before I contribute. And for Christ's sake, why such arrogance in wording this? "you hereby agree that such credit is sufficient in any medium" - no I most certainly do not! You could have at very least have decency to say "you agree to be credited in this way" - still not ideal but at least you don't require of people to agree that black is whit. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
