Mark Wagner wrote: > 2009/6/15 Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]>: >> Дана Monday 15 June 2009 23:20:10 Brian написа: >>> I'm not going to get into any more of a tit-for-tat with you (seriously - >>> its my last post), but I do not claim to have legal counsel. As you would >>> expect, however, both CC and WMF do. The best you could possibly hope to do >>> is listen to their advice since this is unlikely to ever go to >>> court. Additionally, if you wish to contribute to the projects you >>> must contribute according to the intention >>> and correct >>> interpretation of the license. A user's interpretation of the license >>> may or may not be in line with the correct >>> view. If it is not, they should not contribute. That's all I have. >> You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or run a copy >> of the Program. However, nothing other than this License grants you >> permission to propagate or modify any covered work. > > I think we've found part of the problem: that's from the GNU GPL. > Wikipedia is licensed under the GNU FDL.
The same principle is stated the most beautifully in the GPL, but applies to GFDL and CC licences too. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
