I do not understand. About what changes are you talking about? When an article is re-used, it is the fixed target at that time, of course. Everybody can keep the list for the safe of its own business. The WMF should not foreshadow the re-user will be safe with links to WMF's sites for ever. The WMF will not be here for ever.
Jiri On Tuesday, 16. June 2009 13:22:30 Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > This would be acceptable when you are shooting on a fixed target. Given the > huge amount of changes it is too much to ask for. > Thanks, > GerardM > > 2009/6/16 Jiri Hofman <[email protected]> > > > It seems my notice will not be taken in account. OK, I can live with that. > > > > I would like to propose at least one thing which, I hope, can be easily > > accepted. Let's add a notice to "Terms of Use", warning re-users they > > should > > possess a list of authors (for example a database dump) even when they give > > credits by linking to re-used page for a case of its deleting or > > disappearance. I feel this can ensure in a reasonable way that the content > > can stay free even when articles are deleted or WMF closes its business. It > > seems to be fair to both, authors and re-users. Nobody is forced to keep > > dumps or lists of users but if someone does not do it, it can mean problems > > to him. Just a warning that freedom costs and expects something. > > > > Is it possible to add it? > > > > Jiri > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
