Seconded.
On 11/07/2009 19:52, Rjd0060 wrote: > Perhaps everybody should take that advice. I find it mildly amusing that > suddenly we have a list full of legal experts. Can we let those relevant > people do what the will now and stop speculating/guessing/etc. here and > elsewhere? > > --- > Rjd0060 > rjd0060.w...@gmail.com > > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Thomas Dalton<thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >> 2009/7/11 geni<geni...@gmail.com>: >> >>> The case is under English and welsh law. For solid legal reasons the >>> NPG will be willing to make a reasonable settlement. >>> >>> Since we know that the NPG are not completely stupid and English law >>> in any case lacks statutory damages it would seem to be somewhat >>> improbable that any course of action we can take can make them insist >>> on an unreasonable settlement. >>> >> You can't know that and it's not your place to guess. Just stay out of >> it unless Derrick asks for your help. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l