"the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright"
unfounded and untrue. I wish you health and true happiness. teun On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>wrote: > Hoi, > I had a read of the first one. While it is nice that there is an > understanding that copyright has to do with authorship, the fact of the > matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright. This is > best understood in the way they define the types of copyright: > *commercial > *scholarly > > In this way it is forgotten that there is research by people who are none > of > the above. In this duopoly it is easy to give to companies what should not > be theirs in the first place. > Thanks, > GerardM > > 2009/7/13 Klaus Graf <[email protected]> > > > There are much morer statements than by Hamma and Hirtle, see: > > > > http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5405864/ > > http://hangingtogether.org/?p=692 > > > > Klaus Graf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
