> Dennis During wrote: >> Uhm sorry but I don't think it's acceptable to confine ourselves with the >> user vulgaris, which is by definition semi-literate imbecile :) Our target > > Anyone else concerned by this line of reasoning? What happened to > Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia anyone can edit?
Nothing happened and we (at least talking about me) are only realistic in analysis and straight in putting things as they are. Face the reality. Period. Nothing else. ... I’m not talking about any limitations for teenagers or something like that. On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Nikola Smolenski<smole...@eunet.yu> wrote: > Henning Schlottmann wrote: > > Quite frankly, a 15 years old can't contribute to de-WP anymore. Not > > even 20 years olds can. De-WP has reached a level where undergraduates > > Pavlo Shevelo wrote: > > As a matter od fact teenagers contribute mainly to articles about > > sports, movies and other entertainment staff. > > Almost only exception is computers hardware and software stuff. > > Dennis During wrote: >> Uhm sorry but I don't think it's acceptable to confine ourselves with the >> user vulgaris, which is by definition semi-literate imbecile :) Our target > > Anyone else concerned by this line of reasoning? What happened to > Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia anyone can edit? > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
