2009/7/24 Brian <[email protected]>: > I believe the alternate usability interpretation is more persuasive. That by > law they are required to provide attribution and yet many users are totally > unaware a) that they are required to provide attribution b) that a "free" > encyclopedia cares about attribution in the first place and c) of the > specifics of providing attribution. If we consider the burdens that I have > just outlined as compared with the burden of highlighting and deleting some > text its clear that automatically solving the 90% case for users is the > correct thing to do.
Maybe, but not by overiding the standard behaviour of copy and paste. A link in the sidebar to details of how to attribute this article would be better. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
