On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Samuel Klein<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Brian<[email protected]> wrote: >> This comment makes my skin crawl. Everyone is entitled to have a voice and >> it is only the Board's impoverished vision of the community and limited ... > > Brian, I like many things you say while ranting, for instance I think > we need to think about suffrage as something essential to our identity > as a community, not a quick hack that balances commitment and > flood-proofing against openness of process. However, a prickly tone > tends to discourage people from responding to you. > > Can you provide some positive examples of what you would like to see > instead? Would you prefer to have no requirements for editing or > contribution, only a requirement that a voter prove they are a real > and unique snowflak^B^B^B^Bperson? > > SJ
FYI to all: There's an on-wiki discussion of what suffrage requirements should be here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Board_elections/2009/en#Post_mortem -- phoebe _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
